Go AI Agents
Every AI framework defaults to Python. We built ours in Go — and we’d do it again for production enterprise agents. These posts explain the trade-offs, the architecture patterns, and when you shouldn’t follow our path.
Part of the series Building an Enterprise AI Agent Platform in Go.
Featured posts
| Post | What you’ll learn |
|---|---|
| Go vs Python for AI Agents — Why We Chose Go | Language decision for a production agent runtime |
| Architecture at Speed Without Drowning | Growing a Go codebase fast without drowning in complexity |
| Why We Split Runtime From Platform | CLI agent vs enterprise multi-tenant platform |
FAQ
Why use Go instead of Python for AI agents?
Concurrency, single-binary deployment, and static typing for tool middleware and workflow gates. Python wins for research and notebook iteration; Go wins for long-running production agent runtimes.
When should you not choose Go for agents?
When your team lacks Go depth, when you need tight HuggingFace or notebook integration, or when iteration speed on prompts matters more than runtime discipline.
How do you structure an enterprise agent platform in Go?
Split the single-user agent runtime from the multi-tenant platform layer — policy, tenancy, durable workflows, and IaC-configured agents belong in the platform, not the core loop.
Stay in the loop — production notes on AI agents, workflows, and SRE.
Low volume — new posts and curated reading lists. Unsubscribe anytime.